<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On piracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewkantor.com/2008-01/on-piracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewkantor.com/2008-01/on-piracy/</link>
	<description>Andrew Kantor&#039;s comments on technology, the world, and other such things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:18:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lionemom</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkantor.com/2008-01/on-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-18955</link>
		<dc:creator>lionemom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kantor.com/blog/2008/01/on-piracy/#comment-18955</guid>
		<description>I agree with Andrew.  The fact that Radiohead is making money on their latest album release is a testament to the truth of it.

I think the record companies have become as corrupt as the oil companies.  The biggies are no longer in it to produce music that they feel people should hear.  They are in it for pure profit.  They corner the market on their products by selling them through specific retailers and they control what gets on the radio by co-owning the big communications companies that own 90% of the radio stations in the US.  It&#039;s pathetic.

I rarely hear new music on the radio, with the exception of WBRU, Providence, which is still an independent radio station.  They are Alt-Rock, I wouldn&#039;t call them progressive (there is a real progressive station in Long Island, and I can get them on trips to or through CT.)

I usually hear of new stuff I want through other people, whether it&#039;s people I know, blogs I read or stuff recommended to me.

Anyway, I think the days of the big record companies are fading.  I am not sure what will take their place.  Maybe new, smaller, artist-run companies to help new artists produce their albums.  One can only hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Andrew.  The fact that Radiohead is making money on their latest album release is a testament to the truth of it.</p>
<p>I think the record companies have become as corrupt as the oil companies.  The biggies are no longer in it to produce music that they feel people should hear.  They are in it for pure profit.  They corner the market on their products by selling them through specific retailers and they control what gets on the radio by co-owning the big communications companies that own 90% of the radio stations in the US.  It&#8217;s pathetic.</p>
<p>I rarely hear new music on the radio, with the exception of WBRU, Providence, which is still an independent radio station.  They are Alt-Rock, I wouldn&#8217;t call them progressive (there is a real progressive station in Long Island, and I can get them on trips to or through CT.)</p>
<p>I usually hear of new stuff I want through other people, whether it&#8217;s people I know, blogs I read or stuff recommended to me.</p>
<p>Anyway, I think the days of the big record companies are fading.  I am not sure what will take their place.  Maybe new, smaller, artist-run companies to help new artists produce their albums.  One can only hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil C. Reinhartdt</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkantor.com/2008-01/on-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-18934</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil C. Reinhartdt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kantor.com/blog/2008/01/on-piracy/#comment-18934</guid>
		<description>IT IS WRONG!   IT IS STEALING!

PERIOD!

END OF STORY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IT IS WRONG!   IT IS STEALING!</p>
<p>PERIOD!</p>
<p>END OF STORY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leland</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkantor.com/2008-01/on-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-18921</link>
		<dc:creator>Leland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kantor.com/blog/2008/01/on-piracy/#comment-18921</guid>
		<description>Ford owns the copyright on their photos indeed. What a load of dead carp! 

I would hope the Mustang Club told Ford to go pound sand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford owns the copyright on their photos indeed. What a load of dead carp! </p>
<p>I would hope the Mustang Club told Ford to go pound sand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkantor.com/2008-01/on-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-18744</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kantor.com/blog/2008/01/on-piracy/#comment-18744</guid>
		<description>I always suggest folks go look up Cory Doctorow&#039;s experience on how having all his material freely available for anyone to download and read has worked out for him.  He&#039;s one of the most well-known of writers who have done this, and every writer I&#039;ve read about that has tested this has said giving away the work electronically has given greater real-world media sales.

Yes, downloading music/movies is illegal.  I suggest that the recording and movie industries work to make it easier to do, however, as it seems to work well for content owners who do so and many people want to pay for the option to download unrestricted IP but can&#039;t do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always suggest folks go look up Cory Doctorow&#8217;s experience on how having all his material freely available for anyone to download and read has worked out for him.  He&#8217;s one of the most well-known of writers who have done this, and every writer I&#8217;ve read about that has tested this has said giving away the work electronically has given greater real-world media sales.</p>
<p>Yes, downloading music/movies is illegal.  I suggest that the recording and movie industries work to make it easier to do, however, as it seems to work well for content owners who do so and many people want to pay for the option to download unrestricted IP but can&#8217;t do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gnomic</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkantor.com/2008-01/on-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-18742</link>
		<dc:creator>gnomic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kantor.com/blog/2008/01/on-piracy/#comment-18742</guid>
		<description>Movies and music have different properties. Music is short and people listen to the same songs repeatedly. Movies much less so. 

I&#039;ve bought hundreds of albums and ripped most of it to my iPod. Most of it I&#039;ve found through &quot;alternative sources&quot; like pandora.com or NPR and bought much of it via ebay since I rarely find the new stuff I look for in any store or even on Amazon.com (although its gotten much better lately).

And I have a network of people who have similar tastes that I share music with. And like me, they go buy the stuff they like.

And I haven&#039;t asked the RIAA  for a nickle for all the marketing I&#039;ve done for them.

And I recommend mediamonkey as an alternative to the ipod software (which SUCKS and crashes often). Mediamonkey allows me to rip, get the art, level volume, organize, rename, and tranfer songs quite easily. Well worth the money. (No, I get nothing from the recommendation).

The RIAA  is simply trying to control the channels and content for thier own profits, but artists are beginning to find ways (CDBABY, MP3.COM, etc) around the barriers they&#039;ve erected. And people like me are starting to connect to artists we wouldn&#039;t have found 10 years ago. As long as the RIAA  can legislate barriers and intimidate customers and artists, they create an artifical and anticompetative cost structure.

Oh, and they should burn in hell. Sooner if possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Movies and music have different properties. Music is short and people listen to the same songs repeatedly. Movies much less so. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve bought hundreds of albums and ripped most of it to my iPod. Most of it I&#8217;ve found through &#8220;alternative sources&#8221; like pandora.com or NPR and bought much of it via ebay since I rarely find the new stuff I look for in any store or even on Amazon.com (although its gotten much better lately).</p>
<p>And I have a network of people who have similar tastes that I share music with. And like me, they go buy the stuff they like.</p>
<p>And I haven&#8217;t asked the RIAA  for a nickle for all the marketing I&#8217;ve done for them.</p>
<p>And I recommend mediamonkey as an alternative to the ipod software (which SUCKS and crashes often). Mediamonkey allows me to rip, get the art, level volume, organize, rename, and tranfer songs quite easily. Well worth the money. (No, I get nothing from the recommendation).</p>
<p>The RIAA  is simply trying to control the channels and content for thier own profits, but artists are beginning to find ways (CDBABY, MP3.COM, etc) around the barriers they&#8217;ve erected. And people like me are starting to connect to artists we wouldn&#8217;t have found 10 years ago. As long as the RIAA  can legislate barriers and intimidate customers and artists, they create an artifical and anticompetative cost structure.</p>
<p>Oh, and they should burn in hell. Sooner if possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Berlin</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkantor.com/2008-01/on-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-18740</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Berlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kantor.com/blog/2008/01/on-piracy/#comment-18740</guid>
		<description>And how will people stealing movies sell more movies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And how will people stealing movies sell more movies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkantor.com/2008-01/on-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-18736</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kantor.com/blog/2008/01/on-piracy/#comment-18736</guid>
		<description>As I understand it, the artists make most of their money from merchandise and concerts, but not much at all from music sales. The record companies have it the other way around. Ergo, buying a T-shirt supports the artist; buying the music not so much.

This may be wrong. Anyone know the details?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I understand it, the artists make most of their money from merchandise and concerts, but not much at all from music sales. The record companies have it the other way around. Ergo, buying a T-shirt supports the artist; buying the music not so much.</p>
<p>This may be wrong. Anyone know the details?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morkleb</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkantor.com/2008-01/on-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-18735</link>
		<dc:creator>Morkleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kantor.com/blog/2008/01/on-piracy/#comment-18735</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve bought quite a few CDs of bands that I originally heard from pirated music a friend gave me. 

That being said, I&#039;ve *not* bought a lot of CDs because either someone gave me a pirated copy of it or because I found it somewhere else myself. 

I am an iTunes user, but I am usually unable to find the music that I listen to. 

I was under the impression that music companies didn&#039;t make as much from CDs as they did from concerts and merchandising. Is this incorrect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve bought quite a few CDs of bands that I originally heard from pirated music a friend gave me. </p>
<p>That being said, I&#8217;ve *not* bought a lot of CDs because either someone gave me a pirated copy of it or because I found it somewhere else myself. </p>
<p>I am an iTunes user, but I am usually unable to find the music that I listen to. </p>
<p>I was under the impression that music companies didn&#8217;t make as much from CDs as they did from concerts and merchandising. Is this incorrect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trae</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewkantor.com/2008-01/on-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-18727</link>
		<dc:creator>Trae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kantor.com/blog/2008/01/on-piracy/#comment-18727</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got to agree, that regardless of the legality of unauthorized &quot;sharing&quot;, distributors can&#039;t see the benefit of that share.  All they see is lost money.  Another point to keep in mind is that most people that pirate wouldn&#039;t buy the CD even if they couldn&#039;t pirate it.

Also, with the more prevalent use of personal media players including cars that store your music too--in my opinion--proves the fact that people don&#039;t want the radio stations (in turn, major labels) dictating to them what to listen to.

Another good example would be your last post on the Giant&#039;s win (Boo by the way).  I hope you got the &quot;express written consent&quot; from the NFL before you posted that stuff...as they say:
&lt;blockquote&gt;This telecast is copyrighted by the NFL for the private use of our audience. Any other use of this telecast or of any pictures, descriptions, or accounts of the game without the NFL’s consent, is prohibited.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4uC2H10uIo&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Video of the copyright statement&lt;/a&gt;

A little overboard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got to agree, that regardless of the legality of unauthorized &#8220;sharing&#8221;, distributors can&#8217;t see the benefit of that share.  All they see is lost money.  Another point to keep in mind is that most people that pirate wouldn&#8217;t buy the CD even if they couldn&#8217;t pirate it.</p>
<p>Also, with the more prevalent use of personal media players including cars that store your music too&#8211;in my opinion&#8211;proves the fact that people don&#8217;t want the radio stations (in turn, major labels) dictating to them what to listen to.</p>
<p>Another good example would be your last post on the Giant&#8217;s win (Boo by the way).  I hope you got the &#8220;express written consent&#8221; from the NFL before you posted that stuff&#8230;as they say:</p>
<blockquote><p>This telecast is copyrighted by the NFL for the private use of our audience. Any other use of this telecast or of any pictures, descriptions, or accounts of the game without the NFL’s consent, is prohibited.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4uC2H10uIo" rel="nofollow">Video of the copyright statement</a></p>
<p>A little overboard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
