So check this out. “Jackie,” who claimed in one message that she works for Dr. Linda F. Jennings DVM, has been posting other comments using different names.
She posted as “Anonymous” once, and then as “animal lover” in a couple of places.
She’s not very bright. I explained at the beginning that this whole problem resulted from Brambleton Veterinary Hospital’s nasty attitude, and the staff’s refusing to let us take our dog home.
Yet “Jackie” persists in claiming we were trying not to pay.
Well, consider this. Apart from the fact that we were long-time, multiple-animal customers, PJ had a drainage tube in his leg and stitches that had to be removed.
In other words, Jackie dear, we had to come back to the vet. It wouldn’t make sense that we would try to skip out on a bill. (Add to this the simply fact that we paid every bill over the past two or three years that we’d be going there.)
It seems the people at Brambleton Veterinary Hospital are getting pretty desperate. But the cool thing is, comments like Jackie’s … er, “animal lover’s,” just help show a pattern of misinformation and character attacks.
The Fray
Leland says:
Lets see now…
You have an employee of a company disseminating erroneous credit information that, by federal law (Consumer Credit Reporting Act) is deemed to be confidential, in a public forum.
Nope, not the brightest crayon in the box.
What are you going to do with your new veterinary clinic once the judge hands the keys over to you?
Suzanne says:
Wow, this gets better and better. Someone claiming to work at the clinic called you in one post a “stupid, stupid idiot” when she’s really the one who apparently hasn’t grasped all the details of the story. And even if that is what she secretly believes, what kind of moron voices it to a customer’s face? Brilliant business practice. You’re right, Andrew, she’s not very bright.